<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Socializing Online is About to Get a Lot Scarier&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.readermeetauthor.com/2007/08/18/socializing-online-is-about-to-get-a-lot-scarier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.readermeetauthor.com/2007/08/18/socializing-online-is-about-to-get-a-lot-scarier/</link>
	<description>"Have you ever escaped from a shipwrecked life..."</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MY</title>
		<link>http://www.readermeetauthor.com/2007/08/18/socializing-online-is-about-to-get-a-lot-scarier/#comment-1046</link>
		<dc:creator>MY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 20:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.readermeetauthor.com/2007/08/18/socializing-online-is-about-to-get-a-lot-scarier/#comment-1046</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but isn't it fair to have this two-way communication?  If you're there on the street and you see someone doing "their own thing", there is a chance that they might see you watching them, correct? So, if you're able to go online a see those 360 degree street photos including someone doing "their own thing", shouldn't everybody else be able to access your information also?  Share for none or share for all.  I don't like the idea myself, but I'm just playing the devil's advocate here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but isn&#8217;t it fair to have this two-way communication?  If you&#8217;re there on the street and you see someone doing &#8220;their own thing&#8221;, there is a chance that they might see you watching them, correct? So, if you&#8217;re able to go online a see those 360 degree street photos including someone doing &#8220;their own thing&#8221;, shouldn&#8217;t everybody else be able to access your information also?  Share for none or share for all.  I don&#8217;t like the idea myself, but I&#8217;m just playing the devil&#8217;s advocate here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
